Thursday, February 20, 2014

February Monthly Summary - Keith Cozart


February Monthly Summary:

Keith Cozart
I have gravitated to the story and history of Myles Horton and Highlander Education and Research Center (aka Folk School).  Horton’s overall teaching perspective has captured me.  I admire his common man sensibility and his dedication to helping people help them selves.  

I feel as if I’ve gain much more from my group project then individual mostly due to interest in subject matter.  As I look ahead to the next group project, I hope to plan a bit more in advance to site references within my writing as I progress.  I often keep writing with intent to go back and insert (NAME, YEAR) site reference, but often forget.

My learning in the last two months has made its way into my teaching.  I offer a community hand drum class every Tuesday night 7:30pm-8:30. It is mostly just for fun and activity, but we do perform once a semester and take seriousness to our learning with a heavy does of silly wackiness.  Class members are predominantly woman in the age range of 50-65, working or retired professionals, and are seeking something new and different within their life.  I teach them how to play hand drums and recently I’ve approached class time differently.  I ask a lot more questions to class members, I tell more stories, I make more personal connections and make a diligent effort to take interest in who they are and what’s their passion.  I make more of a point to talk about my teachers and how they taught me something specific about drumming. I break things down as far as we need to accomplish the physical movement of a drumming pattern supplying reassurance that it is okay to make mistakes.  Make them loud and proud.  That is how to learn.  Make mistakes, learn something from it and move on.  In short, I try to be more holistically.  Teach the mind, body and soul.

Kyle Owens
In my first month and a half of this class I have grown to know so much more about adult education, than I had previously thought. Whether it was learning about the beginnings of adult education or how it has developed into what we have today. I have learned that adult education isn’t just about how we educate adults on certain subjects, it’s about how adults build knowledge in every aspect of life. I have become very interested in reading about the Chautauqua Institute and the values that they are able to teach adults about church and themselves. I have become motivated to teach outside the norm just like the “Radical Hillbilly” Myles Horton who chose not to conform but to find different ways of giving people a solid education.

Our group work has allowed me to work with my peers as well as learn with them. My fascination with adult education has grown through the group projects. I have found that my group also shares the same passion about adult education as I do. The passion translates into fascinating and well written contributions to our group’s success.

A look ahead (group)
Our group has gone from four members to two, so our first thought is a new division of tasks.  We have some difficult comparisons to make.  For our next paper on Adult programs we have chosen two very different examples.  TED and the Chautauqua Institute.  TED is a relatively new organization while Chautauqua is an established icon with deep history and reputation.

Summary (group)
In summary it is apparent that we have grown in multiple aspects of Adult Education. As we are both in our own personal journey when it comes to our education careers, we can both agree that this class has and will help us. We each have found a figure in adult education that we can relate with and plan to use their tactics in the future. These group activities have helped us understand the fundamentals of education and are very excited for the rest of the semester. When it comes to the group assignments we understand that improvements can always be made and will continue to work on them so that we can deliver the best product possible. With two more months to go in the class, it is apparent that there is so much more to learn and we are prepared for the challenge.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Keith Cozart commented on Group 1 and Group 3 Leading Educators blog

Monday, February 17, 2014

Leading Adult and Community Educators

Leading Adult and Community Educators:
Myles Horton, The Radical Hillbilly and Malcolm Knowles, The Advocate for Andragogy

Myles Horton
Keith Cozart, Kyle Owens and Alexander Snowden
Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Group 4
Division of Responsibilities:
Kyle Owens: Background and Profile
Keith Cozart: Perspectives and Contributions
Alexander Snowden: Impact and Implications

Abstract
This research paper addresses the career history of two leading adult educators Myles Horton and Malcolm Knowles.  Though the exploration of their personal and professional life, educational background, philosophical perspectives, contributions to education, and impact on society this paper will draw some conclusions based on the implications their work has had on the field of adult education.  Both inductees to the International Adult and Continuing Education Hall of Fame, Horton and Knowles dedicated themselves to the betterment of adult learning.
Leading Adult and Community Educators:
Myles Horton, The Radical Hillbilly and Malcolm Knowles, The Advocate for Andragogy

Myles Horton

Background
Myles Horton was a radical idealist when it came to the field of Adult education and was commonly known as the “Radical Hillbilly”. Myles was the co-founder for the Highlander Folk School, a school he got the idea for while visiting folk schools in Denmark. Myles believed that social engagement of issues at these schools took precedent over the more academic style of teaching. The Highlander school was known for its focus on helping those who were impoverished get a solid education. Myles stated in 1982 that “People are creative” and went on to say “You’ve got to allow them to do a lot of things that don’t fit in any kind of system (Moyers, 1982). It was this type of thinking that Myles Horton based all of his theories and ideals from.
Profile:  Myles Horton was born on July 9th, 1905 in rural Savannah, Tennessee. Horton’s parents were both educators who would go on to work other jobs throughout their lives. They had always taught Myles to value the skills and training that citizens had in his community. Myles attended Cumberland University in 1924 in which he focused on Ethnic Diversity. Upon graduation Myles briefly worked at a YMCA before studying at Union Theological Seminary and later went on to attend the University of Chicago. While at the University of Chicago, Horton began to learn about Danish Folk Schools and was so enthused by them that he visited Denmark in the 1930s. While visited Denmark, Myles became motivated to begin his own school that works with people to create and sustain social change. These ideals and motivations would eventually lead to Morton opening the Highlander Folk School in 1932. Sadly Horton lost his battle to brain cancer in January of 1990. Myles beliefs and ideas are still alive today at the Highlander Center.
Philosophical Perspectives: Horton’s teaching mission was to “help people discover within themselves the courage and ability to confront reality and {find ways to} change it” (Horton 1981).  He believed in using people’s creativity and life experiences to help spark ideas and facilitate organized efforts.  Horton insisted that once folks attended Highland Folk School training that they return to their community, organize themselves and make their own decisions.
Appalachian was not only Horton’s home, but also where he chose to dedicate his work efforts.  Growing up poor in rural Savanna, Tennessee he witnessed the hardship of the economically impoverished South.  He’d see laborers working long hours for low wages under hostile working conditions, racially injustices, hungry children, lack of education, and lack of hopefulness.  Via Highlander Horton’s dedications was to help poor working class people take charge of their lives.  He came to believe in people and aimed to facilitate their own learning.  Down to earth experiential learning through analogies and storytelling was the primary mode of education.  Horton’s first wife Zilphia Horton was very active at the school as a musician, bringing local folk songs and melodies to the group learning process. People shared experiences with each other leading to others sharing their own and little-by-little everyone having a “piece of the pie.”
Contributions to Adult Education and Society:  It would slight the impact of Myles Horton’s career to not only include his impact on adult education, but also his impact on society.  He was not a leader/organizer of movements and efforts.  He was an educator of common people with a common goal or interest teaching them how to assert their rights.  One of Horton’s main contributions was integration.  Integration in the 1940s was a heated subject especially in the South.  Highlander housed integrated workshop that lead to the school becoming a meeting ground for the 1950/60s Civil Rights Movement.  Under great scrutiny from local and state government, the community and the Ku Klux Klan, Highlander held workshops with major figures of the movement such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Pete Seeger, Fannie Lou Hamer, and Julian Bond.  Horton’s Highlander was a unique oasis in the legally segregated state of Tennessee.
 Another outstanding contribution of Horton’s was his awareness and practice of speaking with people. He knew not to speak over people’s ability to understand.  He learned this while studying at Union Theological Seminary under Reinhold Niebuhr.  While accompanying Niebuhr to seminars that spoke in high society education riddled terminology, Horton struggled to keep up with the discussions.  Upon confession to Niebuhr that he felt that he was ill fit for the seminars for his lack of understanding, Horton discovered that he was not the only one in the dark.  Niebuhr and his colleagues also were lost.  It was then that he learned to speak to his audience from the heart, not his education.
Impact of Myles Horton:  Myles Horton had a strong impact on adult education through his way of approaching education. He approached education from the perspective that every student was a teacher and every individual was a learner. This impacted the nation in a way that changed laws, gained rights, and create a movement among individuals who were thought to not be capable of breaking the barrier holding them back. When you look at Rosa Parks, a student of Highlander Folk School, you see how her actions created an entire movement. When she refused to move to the back of the bus, she knew that she was in line with her beliefs in the black organizations of Montgomery (Horton, Kohl and Kohl, 1990).  This unique form of protest that she learned from highlander caused her to be the catalyst that started the civil rights movement.  Myles Horton taught effective non-violent activism. This non-violent form of protest has caused individuals who were not able to rise up for a cause to be empowered to fight for what they believe is right and create grass root movements. This not only included the civil rights movement but also led to activism for unionizing labor and education through educating others on personal skills that people already had.
Today these skills have helped shape much of the way we teach adult education today and can be considered the foundation for how communities advocate for change. In areas that individuals do not have open access or fair rights we have seen a rise in a grassroots movement that shares ideals from Myles Horton’s Highlander Folk School. We see individuals holding rallies and seminars to educate the public on why something is a certain way and sharing the skills needed to spread the word and create a movement. These initial learners turned educators then become coordinators and organizers of more individuals creating a large constituent opposed to a given problem that forces those opposing the change to take notice and respond. By moving in a non-violent manner it allows for individuals to get public opinion on the side of the movement and continue to teach and raise awareness in adults that will eventually force a change in culture. Allowing educators to educate individuals through their own knowledge of issues and then allowing them to become confident teachers is the principles of Myles Horton’s impact on adult education.



Malcolm Knowles
Background
Malcolm Knowles was often referred as “The Father of Adult Education” and was a leading figure in adult education during the second half of the twentieth century. Knowles’ career time period ranged from 1940-1979, during this time he attempted to use andragogy to develop conceptual basis for adult learning. While Malcolm was involved in this field he was very active in writing scholarly papers that helped adult educators understand how to help people learn rather than educating them. He also wrote popular works on self-direction and on group work with his wife Hulda (Smith, 2002). These scholarly papers set a precedent that he lived by for the duration of his life, and was responsible for hundreds of adults receiving a good education.
Profile. Malcolm Knowles was born on April 24, 1913 in Livingston, Montana, but was raised in West Palm Beach Florida. As the son of a veterinarian, Myles took a love to the outdoors and was an active boy scout, earning over fifty merit badges. In 1930, Knowles gained an academic scholarship to Harvard University where he studied philosophy, history and political science. During his time at Harvard he served as President for both the Harvard Liberal Club and the Phillips Brooks House which was Harvard’s social service agency.  Along with his studies, Malcolm met his future wife Hulda whom he commonly wrote articles with.
Malcolm originally intended to enter in foreign services upon graduation and even successfully completed the Foreign Service exam. While waiting to join the Foreign Service he took a job with the National Youth Organization where he was in charge of finding out what skills local employers were looking for in potential employees. During his time he met Eduard Lindeman who authored The Meaning of Adult Education; this was Knowles’ first introduction to adult education. In 1943, Knowles was drafted into the Navy and enrolled at the University of Chicago after he was mustered out. While at the University of Chicago his thesis became the basis for his first book in adult education. Malcolm stayed at the University of Chicago until 1959 when he became an associate professor of adult education at Boston University. Knowles often talked about how his times at Boston were the years of tremendous growth for him. After fourteen years at Boston, Knowles once again decided that it was time for change and became the Director of the Department of Education at North Carolina State and stayed there until his retirement in 1974 at the age of 65. Unfortunately, Malcolm Knowles passed away at his home in 1997 from a stroke; he will always be remembered for his contributions to the Adult Education field.
Philosophical Perspectives: Knowles based much of his adult education philosophy on a humanistic approach. Humanism is an outlook that focuses on the importance of humans rather than the divine or supernatural.  It “stress(es) the potential value and goodness of human beings, emphasizes common human needs, and seeks solely rational ways of solving human problems”  (Merriam 2007).  Knowles was probably the most prominent humanistic writer in the field of adult education and his focus on self-directed learning and andragogy reflect the connection. 
Knowles developed a list of four basic assumptions.  (1) Adults are naturally self-directed learners.  As children we are more dependent and into adulthood we move into directing our own learning.  (2) Adults have life experience that can be a vast resource when tapped.  Life experience resources not only benefit the individual but others within a learning environment.  (3) Learning occurs more effectively when adults recognize the need to gain knowledge.  It is basic economics.  If there is a demand to improve quality of life, when the supply is available (education) then learning happens more effectively. (4) There is a natural desire among adults to develop competency.  From infancy, humans like to feel good for doing something that takes skill and knowledge.  Even more we enjoy praise for a job well done.  Competency leads to confidence and confidence helps change lives.
Contributions to Adult Education and Society:  The most enduring contribution by Knowles was his development and popularization of the definition and concepts of Andragogy.  Andragogy is the art and science of helping adults learn. This is in contrast to the term Pedagogy, which are the methods and practices of teaching academic subjects and theories in most often a formal learning environment.  Knowles developed many strategies and best practice lists based on his dedication to Andragogy.  One of which is his To-Do list for educators.
In a short spotlight video of Knowles’ career contributions by RichEducators (Chotani 2008) entitled Spotlight on Malcolm Knowles, the author highlights a To-Do list for educators proposed and exemplified through Knowles model:
To-Do list for educators.
1.     Physical Environment: Relax the classroom environment by arranging it in an informal way so that learners feel at ease.  Good light, sound and temperature.
2.     Psychological Environment: Support students with displays of respect so that they feel accepted and open to express themselves.
3.     Need identification: Outline the characteristics needed by an individual to achieve desired level of proficiency in performance.  Self-diagnosed learning needs
4.     Involvement: Involve learners in the plan of their own education
5.     Balance teaching and learning: Make learning a mutual responsibility between teacher and learner.
6.     Familiar teaching methods:  Use teaching methods familiar to the learner’s prior knowledge base and life experience.
7.     Problem solving:  Include learners in problem solving processes.  Adult learners respond to problem areas, not subjects.
To summarize the To-Do list, rather than telling learners how and what they need to learn, work with them to achieve their own learning goals.
Impact of Malcolm Knowles: Malcolm Knowles impacted adult education through his four assumptions and to – do list approach to education. When you break down his teachings and the impact it has had on adult education you see that much of the foundation of today’s out of the classroom education is based on his concepts. Previously, education seemed to focus on mission and vision. When applied to education, specifically in adults, you see the concepts of reflection, analysis, and ability to gain knowledge through the tools one possesses. The concept that adults already have the skills and knowledge to learn and that it was applying what was natural and known to educate adults. Another way of looking at this approach is developing and assessing the journey to where an individual is at a given time.
This impact can most closely relate to the out of the classroom experience. Applied to a student organization you see an officer serving as a treasurer. It is more than just money an individual will deal with, it is what they apply from previous teaching to effectively manage and learn as adults.  An individual learns to budget, balance books, manage, develop payment plans, and in a sense effectively run the finances of a business. This concept of adult informal education is the foundation of student affairs in a university but also to the general community as learning and supporting through actions and participations. Self-guidance, reflection of experiences, need of gaining knowledge, and development of competencies all are shown through educating adults outside of the classroom. These concepts are the foundations created by Knowles that effect adult education today.
Implications of Myles Horton and Malcolm Knowles:  Both individuals have contributed heavily to adult education. They both share a concept of learning by doing and developing others by teaching skills they currently have. The application to us as educators has helped to develop a foundation to our work.
Malcom Knowles has taught us to apply informal adult education by learning about concepts which we already have from past life experiences and applying them to our personal growth. Through this application we are able to educate and develop others by helping them realize what they have learned through self-guidance and reflection. This means as educators we need to create real life scenarios and application that allow learners to problem solve on their own and find solutions so that they are able to learn from what they apply.
Myles Horton taught us how we can educate others through grass root movements. Utilizing his model that he applied to the Highlander Folk School, we are able to not only be teachers based on what we know but also learners. As educators, we apply his theories by teaching a small number of individuals and allowing them to spread the word exponentially. This teaches how to start a movement and rally individuals to a given cause. It also teaches us to utilize our strengths and skills by passing them on to others so that everyone can learn and grow from each other.
            Both Myles Horton and Malcom Knowles have shaped our view of adult education today. Although, both did not work together and founded their theories around the same time, they both focus on utilizing personal skills and trait to educate others. As adult educators we must not only learn from each other but gain skills from our past and others to apply to learner’s growth and development. According to Horton and Knowles we are both educators and learners.


Myles Horton
Malcolm Knowles
Career Time Period
1932 - 1973
1940 – 1979
Background
Nicknamed the Radical Hillbilly. Cofounder of Highlander Folk School later renamed Highlander Research and Education Center (1961) in Tennessee
Referred to as the Father of Adult Learning.  Active scholarly writer and helped identify the field of Adult Education as a profession.
Profile
Rural Tennessee Christian upbringing.  Higher education at Cumberland University, Union Theological Seminary and University of Chicago.  Travel to Europe and visited Danish folks schools that emphasized more social engagement than other issues which helped shape the ideals of Highlander.
Born in Montana and raised in West Palm Beach Florida. Avid boy scout.  High education at Harvard (BA), University of Chicago (MA and PhD).  Employment at YMCA, Boston University and North Carolina State University. Popularized the term Andragogy, Learning Contacts, and was an advocate for self-directed learning within adult ed.
Perspectives
Believed in people. Through experiential learning helped people discover within themselves the courage and ability to confront reality and in turn change it.
Knowles four assumptions:
Adults:
1.     are self-directed learners
2.     have prior experiences that are resource for learning
3.     learn when they feel a need for life skills (demand)
4.     want to develop competency
Contributions to Ad. Ed and Society
1930s- Labor union organization
1940s- Integrated Workshops
1950s- Civil Rights Movement
1960s- Weathered governmental attacks
1970s- Coal mining health awareness
1980/90s- Environmental issues such as fight on pollution and toxic dumping.
Developed the principles of Andragogy and helped develop a standard for practitioners within the field on how to organize their learning environments.


Impact
Effective non-violent activism that led to historic changes within global society.
“People are creative,…you've got to allow them to do a lot of things that don't fit any kind of system." (Horton, 1981)
Adaptation of his best principles and practices being implemented in the modern adult ed classroom.

Learning Contracts
Implications
Idea development through experiential learning can be life changing especially for repressed people who become empowered and motivated to change what they feel is wrong.
Humanistic philosophy to educations.  Identified a need for education differentiation between Pedagogy and Andragogy.
References
Bates, C. (2009). Malcolm Knowles. Retrieved February 16, 2014, from http://web.utk.edu/~start6/knowles/malcolm_knowles.
Chotani, I. (2008, September 21). Spotlight on Malcolm Knowles. [Video File].  Retrieved from http://youtu.be/U4iMFu4CnLQ
Horton, A.I., (1989). The highlander folk school, a history of its major programs, 1932-1961. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson
Horton, M. (2014). The biography channel website. Retrieved 07:43, Feb 14, 2014, from http://www.biography.com/people/myles-horton-21385743.
Horton, M., Myles Horton biography. Retrieved on Feb 14, 2014 from http://www.biography.com/people/myles-horton-21385743?page=2
Horton, M., Kohl, J. and Kohl, H. (1990). The long haul: An audiobiography, New York: Doubleday.
Merriam, S.B., & Brockett R.G., (2007), The profession and practice of adult education. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Moyer, B. (1981, September 4). The adventures of a radical hillbilly part 1. [Video File].  Retrieved from Feb 14, 2014 from http://youtu.be/qSwW0zc-QBQ
Moyers, B. (1982). The adventures of a radical hillbilly an interview with Myles Horton, Appalachian Journal, 9(4), 248-285.
Smith, M. K. (2002), Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and andragogy, the encyclopedia of informal education, Retrieved Feb 15, 2014 from www.infed.org/thinkers/et-knowl.htm.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Keith Cozart commented on Chris Cathcart from Group 1 and  Group 2 Erin Rusher

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

1950's: The Decade of Mass Higher Education by Alex Snowden





            The decade is the 1950’s and America is changing. Truman is leading the country as the hydrogen bomb is completed and the Korean War has started. The United States has passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 which opens the door for an influx of U.S. citizenship by ending racial and ethnic barriers. After Truman’s presidency ends Eisenhower is made the leader of the country and the future of the United States is ever changed. Between 1953 and 1959 the country would enter into a time of turmoil with the launch of the McCarthy hearings and the beginning of the civil rights movement. (http://kclibrary.lonestar.edu/decade50.html)  The 1950’s were not only plagued by turmoil but also experienced many successes in a number of fields. Polio was cured and the first organ transplant occurred. The 1950’s also brought credit cards, color television, and even car seat belts. (http://history1900s.about.com/od/timelines/tp/1950timeline.htm) To understand the nature of higher education in a given decade, one must understand the trials of the time and the culture of the country. 

First, understanding the makeup of colleges and universities between 1950 -1959 will help understand how colleges are changed over time during this decade. In 1950 there were 2.2 million students enrolled in degree seeking institutions with 32% of those students being women.  (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2012, table 221). This is spread out between 1,851 2 year and 4 year institutions. (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 1995, table 233)  By the end of 1959 this number would grow to 3.6 million students enrolled with 35% being women (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2012, table 221). The number of institutions would also increase by 153 (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 1995, table 233). Information in regards to the racial makeup of students could not be found since data for this information was not tracked nationwide until 1960. This is based on information collected from the National Center for Education Statistics which is an entity of the U.S. Department of Education. (http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/1995menu_tables.asp). The increase in growth among universities and colleges, shown above, can be linked to a number of factors. These include politics, court rulings, funding, type of student, and a number of other factors.

Higher education in the 1950’s had a large number of landmark cases that would shape how culture, student body, and governance would create the foundation of modern education today. Prior to 1950 a number of reports were published on access to college and the inequity between students of different races, creeds, and religions. This can be summed up by Floyd Reeves and his summary of the 1949 National Conference on Discrimination. He stated that the numerous studies showed, “restricted curriculums and inadequate educational facilities are serious barriers to education. Large numbers of youths face economic and geographic barriers so serious that they cannot be overcome under present conditions.” (Brown, Reeves, & Anliot, 1951, p. 7)  In 1950 two court cases laid the groundwork for equality in education. The first was Sweatt v. Painter which focused on two separate law schools. The ruling stated that although two separate law schools exist, “they are not equal because of the association that students make during their years has an on their success.” (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 195) This ruling was used in support of McLaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education later that year. This ruling forced the University of Oklahoma to give an African American doctoral student the same rights and privileges of all students. (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 195). The effects of this ruling were used across the country to try to get people of color into universities. 

In 1950, Jesse Lawrence, a state representative of Kentucky was able to amend the Day Law to allow African American students to attend any institution if courses of equal quality were not available at Kentucky State. (Hardin, 1997, p. 100) The Day Law was an act passed in 1904 that stated, “Blacks and whites were to be educated separately in order to preserve white racial sanctity and social order.” (Hardin, 1997, p. 13). This amendment paved the way for approximately 679 African American students to attend historically white colleges within the state of Kentucky. (Hardin, 1997, p. 104). In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education would change the culture of universities forever. The supreme court ruled, “that separating children solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority, therefore separate education facilities are inherently unequal.” Although credited many times for bringing down separate but equal, it was actually Florida ex rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control in 1956 that extended the reach of Brown v. Board of Education to higher education institutions. (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 196). While the courts influenced and shaped university culture and access it was not the only significant pieces of the 1950’s to higher education.

With an increase need of educated and skilled work force, the need for graduates of higher education institutions significantly expanded. This was due to a number of factors including the creation of branch campuses, community colleges, and the transformation of specialized schools into all-purpose institutions. Although this created more opportunities to enroll students into universities by increasing enrollment needs, it was not the factor that led to the mass growth of universities. These factors were accredited to the “variety of types of institutions, decentralized authority, multiple funding sources, and the need for open access.” (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 199)

First the growth of institution types, branch campuses, building of more educational buildings, and mass influx of students can be partly accredited to the GI Bill. At the close of World War II a large number of military personnel wanted to return to the work force. At the same time, women were not returning to the traditional house wife roles as many did following World War I putting strain on traditional male jobs. This influx of soldiers created a large cash flow from the government through the GI Bill. Women would suffer from this influx due to what society and universities would deem as male field of studies and “intensifying the split … and those deemed appropriate for women.” (Thelin, 2004, p. 267) The GI bill and the desegregation laws alone did not contribute to the mass influx of college students during this time. The concept of advanced placement in 1953 started to take root. Sputniks launch in 1957 caused the United States to also begin “taking inventory of its manpower resources”. Advance placement is the concept of, “unusually capable students were admitted not only to college but to sophomore standing by successfully passing courses of collegiate grade in high school.” (Brubacher & Rudy, 1997, p. 249-250)   These three major factors would increase those attending college and university by approximately 39% at the end of the decade.

The second product of the 1950’s was that definitions of institutions were beginning to change. Prior to 1950 the two dominate types of institutions were comprehensive and research. The race for research funds, graduate programs, and being allowed to create more stringent admissions qualifications allowed these universities to better define their needs without repercussions. They would do this in part through the SAT. However, in 1959 researchers in Iowa believed a better method could be used to articulate student admission. They created the ACT to “combine admissions decisions with informed decisions about field of study and choice of major.” (Thelin, 2004, p. 303) The funding for these changes came in large part from state funding and federal tuition from the various types of students entering the university system. As enrollment increased, the need to redefine educational needs began to be considered across the United States. The raising admission qualifications of the research and comprehensive universities allowed the enrollment and spread of community colleges. (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 200) This change and increase in students attending community colleges also gave way to a need to create regional campuses that would be governed by the state comprehensive universities. Although a number of university systems were in place, many states began creating consolidated systems and flagship systems among the different institutions in this decade to better manage the influx of students and access of education. This is where the community colleges and regional campuses would end up gaining governance from. A consolidated system is, “a result from the aggregation under a new central administration and governing board of previously existing campuses.” Flagship systems are defined as, “extension of an established campus in a system either by the creation of new campuses or the absorption of old ones.” (Lane & Johnstone, 2013, p. 47)  

The last major change of the 1950’s was funding which tied a rise in enrollment and growth of universities together. “Federal grant universities,” which was another name for universities receiving funds from the government, opened the door for another university cash flow to support the institutions. Kerr stated, “Currently, federal support has become a major factor in the total performance of many universities, and the sums involved are substantial.” (Thelin, 2004, p. 278) One major change was the Veterans Readjustment Act of 1952 which “directed the U.S. commissioner of education to publish a list of approved accrediting associations.” (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 262)  Theses accreditation bodies would be the gatekeepers to federal funding by creating the guidelines that colleges and universities would have to follow to receive federal funding. This is a significant change to just research grants coming to the university. This type of funding made way to comprehensive requirements and objectives being created that were dependent on how much aid you would receive from the government. One way a university could increase their funding is through graduate programs and terminal degrees. In 1950, enrollment in this level of education doubled to 237,200. (Thelin, 2004, p. 281) Federal funding also came in the form of the Housing Act and National Act of 1958 that would give money to universities to build housing and teach foreign languages. (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 253)

Although, this was a positive course for established universities, the newer and up and coming universities would lose money to create graduate programs so they could in turn gain from the investments. This was due to faculty salaries, constraints of size, and the need to attract students. Another factor to funding came at the expense of the Carnegie Mellon Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The fund had dried up and the foundation eventually withdrew as a predominant funding source. (Thelin, 2004, p. 283) This was replaced by the Ford Foundation taking a dominate role by 1954 as not only a funding body but a catalyst for universities to learn how to subsidies costs. Universities learned from the Ford Foundation that grants and federal aid could not be the only source of income and began to create funding generating departments outside of just alumni donations as a staple to the university.

The 1950’s also brought a change to campus life known as “Joe College” and “Betty Co-ed.” The concept is explained as, “a college man was a full time student who entered college immediately after high school, planned to graduate in four years, chose a major in his field in his junior year, look forward to marrying his college sweetheart Betty Co-ed, and sought a career position in a large corporation.” (Thelin, 2004, p. 297) This generation of students would come to be known as the silent generation. They were considered “disinterested in social and political affairs. They were criticized as conformists lacking in independent thought.” (Cohen & Kisker, 2010, p. 215) This can be attributed partly to missing the Great War and being in school prior to the large portion of the civil rights movement. In the university setting men and women of the silent generation saw, “G.I. veterans everywhere, running the clubs, getting more financial aid, and the pick of marriageable women.” (Strauss & Howe, 1991, p. 287) This generation of male students outpaced the G.I. generation in attendance at college but the women showed no gain.  (Strauss & Howe, 1991, p. 285) 

Upon exploration into the history of the 1950’s, it can be determined that this was the decade that began mass access to higher education. The decade brought the beginning of equality to all citizens and greater affordability through options in types of institutions. Higher education institutions also benefited from the progress of the times by receiving new forms of income, an increase in campus development, and higher enrollments. Nationally, the 1950’s shaped the country to maintain its status as a leader in education and laid the groundwork to overcome obstacles and move the country forward.








Table 1:  Summary of the History of Adult Education
Areas
Summary


Highlights
1. Landmark Judicial Cases such as: Brown v. Board of Education, Sweatt v. Painter

2. Increase in types of institutions

3. Increase in funding sources

4. Open access

5. Increase in construction


Influential Factors
1. Landmark Cases

2. More institutions of Higher Learning increased access

3. Cold War and Korean War

4. Accreditation and Federal Funding

5. Increase in Graduate Schools and terminal Degree Programs


Implications
1. Increase in number of students attending school

2. Access granted to individuals who have not previously had access to higher education

3. A need to increase funding to fund science, defense, and education

4. Increase access to federal and private funding to fund college access

5. Increase in regional schools and community colleges



References